<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Food and Dining &#8211; Brookfield Examiner</title>
	<atom:link href="https://brookfieldexaminer.com/category/food-and-dining/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://brookfieldexaminer.com</link>
	<description>Shining a Spotlight on Brookfield, Every Story, Every Day</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 May 2026 22:50:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Questions Raised After Charlton Coalition Health Agent Denies Food Truck Permit Tied to Neighboring Farm</title>
		<link>https://brookfieldexaminer.com/2026/05/06/questions-raised-after-charlton-coalition-health-agent-denies-food-truck-permit-tied-to-neighboring-farm/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Christopher Kelleher]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2026 21:02:01 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Community News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food and Dining]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Local Government]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://brookfieldexaminer.com/?p=1947</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[FOOD TRUCK OWNER QUESTIONS PERMIT DENIAL LINKED TO NEIGHBOR DISPUTE Questions Raised After Charlton Coalition Health Agent Denies Food Truck Permit Tied to Neighboring Farm By Christopher Kelleher A dispute involving a first-year local food truck business is raising questions about permitting standards, conflict-of-interest concerns, and the role of a regional health inspector who allegedly &#8230;<p class="read-more"> <a class="" href="https://brookfieldexaminer.com/2026/05/06/questions-raised-after-charlton-coalition-health-agent-denies-food-truck-permit-tied-to-neighboring-farm/"> <span class="screen-reader-text">Questions Raised After Charlton Coalition Health Agent Denies Food Truck Permit Tied to Neighboring Farm</span> Read More &#187;</a></p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[		<div data-elementor-type="wp-post" data-elementor-id="1947" class="elementor elementor-1947">
							<div class="elementor-element elementor-element-b2c7155 e-flex e-con-boxed e-con e-parent" data-id="b2c7155" data-element_type="container" data-settings="{&quot;content_width&quot;:&quot;boxed&quot;}" data-core-v316-plus="true">
					<div class="e-con-inner">
				<div class="elementor-element elementor-element-50d798b elementor-widget elementor-widget-text-editor" data-id="50d798b" data-element_type="widget" data-widget_type="text-editor.default">
				<div class="elementor-widget-container">
			<style>/*! elementor - v3.16.0 - 20-09-2023 */
.elementor-widget-text-editor.elementor-drop-cap-view-stacked .elementor-drop-cap{background-color:#69727d;color:#fff}.elementor-widget-text-editor.elementor-drop-cap-view-framed .elementor-drop-cap{color:#69727d;border:3px solid;background-color:transparent}.elementor-widget-text-editor:not(.elementor-drop-cap-view-default) .elementor-drop-cap{margin-top:8px}.elementor-widget-text-editor:not(.elementor-drop-cap-view-default) .elementor-drop-cap-letter{width:1em;height:1em}.elementor-widget-text-editor .elementor-drop-cap{float:left;text-align:center;line-height:1;font-size:50px}.elementor-widget-text-editor .elementor-drop-cap-letter{display:inline-block}</style>				<div>
<h2>FOOD TRUCK OWNER QUESTIONS PERMIT DENIAL LINKED TO NEIGHBOR DISPUTE</h2>
<h4>Questions Raised After Charlton Coalition Health Agent Denies Food Truck Permit Tied to Neighboring Farm</h4>
<p><i>By Christopher Kelleher</i></p>
<p>A dispute involving a first-year local food truck business is raising questions about permitting standards, conflict-of-interest concerns, and the role of a regional health inspector who allegedly previously complained about the same property tied to the application.</p>
<p>Smashing Patties owner Nathaniel Lundstrom told the Brookfield Examiner that he applied for a mobile food permit to operate in East Brookfield while using Wildberry Acres Farm as part of his commissary and base-of-operation arrangement.</p>
<p>According to emails reviewed by the Examiner, Lundstrom was asked to provide additional documentation during the permitting process, including information related to water sourcing, wastewater disposal, inspections, and fire permitting.</p>
<p>Lundstrom stated that he complied with those requests, including obtaining a fire department permit related to the trailer’s hood suppression and ventilation system. He also stated that he paid the required $120.00 application fee to East Brookfield as part of the permitting process.</p>
<p>Despite that, Lundstrom said he ultimately received a brief email from regional health inspector Molly Tuller stating only:</p>
<blockquote>
<p><b>“You are not eligible for permitting in East Brookfield.”</b></p>
</blockquote>
<p>The email did not identify any specific regulation, code provision, or deficiency explaining why the application was denied.</p>
<p>The denial is drawing attention because Lundstrom says he has already received permits or approvals from neighboring communities including Brookfield, Brimfield, Southbridge, and is finalizing permitting in West Brookfield.</p>
<p>The Brookfield Examiner has previously reported on Brookfield’s strict permitting environment involving food operations and local businesses. As a result, Lundstrom’s approval in Brookfield is raising additional questions about the basis for East Brookfield’s determination that he was “not eligible” for permitting.&nbsp;</p>
<p>According to Lundstrom, the permitting process became more difficult after regional health inspector Molly Tuller learned that Wildberry Acres Farm would be used as the commissary location.</p>
<p>Lundstrom alleges that Tuller — the same official responsible for reviewing and determining the fate of his application — repeatedly encouraged him to find a different commissary or base of operation elsewhere, despite already obtaining approval from Brookfield to use the property.</p>
<p>Lundstrom stated that alternative locations in Worcester and Brookfield were suggested by Tuller during the process.</p>
<p>The matter is further complicated by emails reviewed by the Examiner showing that Molly Tuller had previously raised complaints involving Wildberry Acres Farm as a neighboring resident before later participating in permit decisions tied to the same property.</p>
<p>In an April 2 email, Brookfield Town Administrator Bob Ayers wrote that he had received a call from Tuller “concerned about her neighbor making food without a permit.”</p>
<p>Former Brookfield Board of Health Chair Christina Predella confirmed to the Brookfield Examiner that Molly Tuller had previously raised concerns with Brookfield officials regarding Wildberry Acres Farm in her capacity as a private citizen and neighboring resident.</p>
<p>Predella stated that she personally spoke with Tuller for approximately 20 to 30 minutes regarding the matter and explained that Brookfield had reviewed the operation under the town’s Right-to-Farm protections and determined the farm was operating compliantly.</p>
<p>According to Predella, she encouraged Tuller to attempt to resolve any remaining concerns directly with her neighbors, describing the owners of Wildberry Acres as “nice people.”</p>
<p>However, Wildberry Acres owner Lea Moreau later told the Brookfield Examiner that Tuller never ultimately reached out or attempted to discuss the concerns directly with the farm.</p>
<p>Predella previously wrote in an email reviewed by the Examiner that after discussions regarding the matter, Tuller “did not feel the need to move forward with any formal Board of Health discussion.”</p>
<p>Moreau further alleges that Tuller privately complained about the farm’s kitchen operations, driveway activity, lighting, and food-related use of the property. Moreau argues the situation now presents a conflict-of-interest concern because the same official later participated in permit decisions involving the property.</p>
<p>Lundstrom says the delayed appeal timeline is now impacting his business directly. According to emails reviewed by the Examiner, he was informed he could appeal the determination to the East Brookfield Board of Health at its next meeting scheduled for June 1.</p>
<p>However, Lundstrom stated that several planned East Brookfield events will occur before that date, forcing him to cancel appearances during what would have been his first operating season.</p>
<p>“This is my first year in business,” Lundstrom told the Examiner. “I’m just trying to sell burgers. I’m not looking for a fight.”</p>
<p>Lundstrom also stated that he had originally planned to pursue permitting in Sturbridge, but ultimately decided against it after learning that the same regional coalition oversees permitting there as well.</p>
<p>“I just don’t want to go through the same fight again,” he said.</p>
<p>When contacted by the Brookfield Examiner for comment regarding the denial, the permitting process, and questions surrounding potential conflicts of interest, Molly Tuller stated that she had “no comment.” When asked whether she wished to provide any clarification or response whatsoever regarding the matter, Tuller again stated “no,” and the call abruptly ended.</p>
<p>The Brookfield Examiner also contacted the Charlton Coalition for Public Health seeking clarification regarding the permitting process, conflict-of-interest policies, and the basis for the determination that Lundstrom was “not eligible” for permitting in East Brookfield. A response was not received prior to publication.</p>
</div>
<p><!-- /wp:paragraph --></p>						</div>
				</div>
					</div>
				</div>
							</div>
		]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Brookfield Business Faces Lengthy Process to Sell Prepackaged Food</title>
		<link>https://brookfieldexaminer.com/2026/04/27/brookfield-business-faces-lengthy-process-to-sell-prepackaged-food/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Christopher Kelleher]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2026 14:08:57 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Community News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food and Dining]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Local Government]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://brookfieldexaminer.com/?p=1859</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Brookfield Business Faces Lengthy Process to Sell Prepackaged Food BROOKFIELD, MA — What began as a simple plan to offer food products at a local retail shop has turned into a complicated, months-long permitting process involving multiple applications, shifting requirements, and repeated requests for clarification, according to the owner of Post Road Trading. Bonnie Toomey, &#8230;<p class="read-more"> <a class="" href="https://brookfieldexaminer.com/2026/04/27/brookfield-business-faces-lengthy-process-to-sell-prepackaged-food/"> <span class="screen-reader-text">Brookfield Business Faces Lengthy Process to Sell Prepackaged Food</span> Read More &#187;</a></p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[		<div data-elementor-type="wp-post" data-elementor-id="1859" class="elementor elementor-1859">
							<div class="elementor-element elementor-element-4e162f6 e-flex e-con-boxed e-con e-parent" data-id="4e162f6" data-element_type="container" data-settings="{&quot;content_width&quot;:&quot;boxed&quot;}" data-core-v316-plus="true">
					<div class="e-con-inner">
				<div class="elementor-element elementor-element-05cee7b elementor-widget elementor-widget-text-editor" data-id="05cee7b" data-element_type="widget" data-widget_type="text-editor.default">
				<div class="elementor-widget-container">
							<h1><b>Brookfield Business Faces Lengthy Process to Sell Prepackaged Food</b></h1>
<p></p>
<p><b>BROOKFIELD, MA —</b> What began as a simple plan to offer food products at a local retail shop has turned into a complicated, months-long permitting process involving multiple applications, shifting requirements, and repeated requests for clarification, according to the owner of Post Road Trading.</p>
<p>Bonnie Toomey, the shop’s owner, said she initially explored allowing an outside vendor to operate within her store and sell baked goods. That plan ultimately fell through due to permitting challenges.</p>
<p>She then pivoted to a more limited idea: offering coffee alongside prepackaged baked goods sourced from a licensed wholesaler.</p>
<p>According to Toomey, she was advised by the Director of the Leicester Regional Public Health Coalition (LRPHC)—which provides public health inspection and permitting services for Brookfield—that she would need to complete a food safety certification course and apply for permitting. She paid approximately $175, took a full day away from her business, and arranged for someone to cover her store in order to complete the training.</p>
<p>Only after completing those steps, she said, was she informed that the operation would require additional infrastructure—including a three-compartment sink and a dedicated handwashing sink—requirements typically associated with full food preparation.</p>
<p>Because Toomey does not own the building, those changes were not feasible, forcing her to abandon that plan.</p>
<p><b>That determination, she said, came only after she had already completed the required course and incurred associated costs.</b></p>
<p>“It would have been helpful to know that upfront,” she said.</p>
<h4><b>Shift to Prepackaged Goods</b></h4>
<p>Following that setback, Toomey shifted again—this time to selling only prepackaged, commercially produced items, including sealed jellies and jams.</p>
<p>Even that, she said, triggered additional requirements.</p>
<p>Emails reviewed by the <i>Brookfield Examiner</i> show that she was directed by the Leicester Regional Public Health Coalition (LRPHC), the Town’s contracted public health provider, to complete both a food permit application and a plan review process.</p>
<p>The plan review application itself spans more than 20 pages and is typically used to evaluate the layout, equipment, and design of food establishments.</p>
<p>Toomey said she was also required to submit a floor plan indicating where products would be stored. She was told the purpose was to ensure items would be kept at least six inches off the ground.</p>
<p>“I’m a retailer,” she said. “I’m not putting food on the floor.”</p>
<p>During the process, Toomey said she was additionally told she would need an allergen-related permit. After reviewing state regulations herself, she questioned whether that requirement applied to her operation.</p>
<p>According to Toomey, the issue went back and forth before the requirement was ultimately withdrawn.</p>
<p>“They came back and said I was right—that I didn’t need it,” she said.</p>
<p>Toomey also said she was given conflicting information about the cost of the permit itself—being told it would be either $50 or $100. Unable to get a definitive answer, she submitted two separate checks, one for each amount, with her application.</p>
<p><b>Despite submitting the requested materials and fees, Toomey said she still does not have approval to sell jelly and is scheduled to appear before the Board of Health on April 29.</b></p>
<p>Toomey also expressed frustration with how the process was communicated.</p>
<p>She described her interactions as unclear at times, saying she struggled to get direct answers to questions about what would ultimately be required.</p>
<p>“I just couldn’t get a straight answer,” she said.</p>
<p>Toomey said the lack of clarity made it difficult to plan and resulted in additional time and expense as she adjusted her business model.</p>
<h4><b>Two-Tier Permitting System Identified</b></h4>
<p>Records reviewed by the <i>Brookfield Examiner</i> show that Brookfield maintains two separate application processes for food establishments.</p>
<p>A standard Food Establishment Application—used for routine permitting—is relatively short and covers basic operational and licensing requirements.</p>
<p>In addition, the town also utilizes a separate Food Establishment Plan Review Application, which spans more than 20 pages and is typically intended for new construction, major renovations, or more complex food operations.</p>
<p>Archived records from 2023 show only the shorter, standard application in use at that time.<span class="Apple-converted-space">&nbsp;</span></p>
<p>The expanded plan review process now being applied represents a significantly more detailed level of review than what appears in earlier records.&nbsp;<span style="font-style: inherit; text-align: var(--text-align);">The existence of both processes raises questions about how and when each application is applied—particularly in cases involving limited retail sales of prepackaged food.</span></p>
<h4><b>Regional Comparison Raises Additional Questions</b></h4>
<p data-start="1351" data-end="1570">A review of permitting materials from multiple municipalities—including both neighboring towns and larger jurisdictions—highlights significant differences in how similar food establishment applications are administered.</p>
<p data-start="1572" data-end="1752">In East Brookfield, food permit applications covering both retail and open food operations are approximately three to five pages in length and require a single application and fee.</p>
<p data-start="1754" data-end="1922">West Brookfield’s process similarly consists of a straightforward application and checklist requiring basic documentation such as certification, insurance, and payment.</p>
<p data-start="1924" data-end="2067">In Sturbridge, applicants complete a consolidated packet of approximately six to seven pages, with requirements clearly outlined at the outset.</p>
<p data-start="2069" data-end="2246">In Spencer, a larger municipality, a single Food Establishment Application covering full restaurant operations—including kitchens and food trucks—spans approximately five pages.</p>
<p data-start="2248" data-end="2622">Boston, one of the state’s largest municipalities, utilizes a structured, step-based process that clearly distinguishes when a full plan review is required. Under Boston’s system, plan review is limited to cases involving new construction, renovation, or significant operational changes, while routine permitting is handled through a standard application and inspection process.</p>
<p data-start="2624" data-end="2895">By comparison, the process described by Toomey in Brookfield—administered through the Leicester Regional Public Health Coalition (LRPHC)—includes a plan review application exceeding 20 pages, along with additional documentation requirements and multiple stages of review.</p>
<p data-start="2897" data-end="3102">The variation between municipalities raises questions about how similar state food code standards are being interpreted and applied—particularly in cases involving limited retail sales of prepackaged food.</p>
<h4><b>Board of Health Chair Raises Concerns</b></h4>
<p>Brookfield Board of Health Chair Christina Predella said she became involved after hearing directly from Toomey regarding the permitting delays and confusion.</p>
<p>Predella said she has worked to gather the full history of the matter, communicate with LRPHC for clarification, and place Post Road Trading on the Board of Health agenda—similar to recent actions taken to assist other business permitting matters.</p>
<p>Emails show Predella questioned LRPHC regarding whether all applications and requirements being requested were necessary and sought clarification on several points where the business owner had received inconsistent or incomplete information.</p>
<p>Predella emphasized that while LRPHC serves as Brookfield’s contracted subject matter expert for public health and food code enforcement, the Board has raised concerns about communication, efficiency, and whether all requirements are being clearly explained upfront to applicants.</p>
<p><b><i>“Our goal is to support businesses while ensuring compliance with public health regulations,” Predella said. “When business owners are not given complete information upfront, it creates unnecessary delays, expense, and frustration. We are actively working to improve that process.”</i></b></p>
<h4><b>A Broader Question</b></h4>
<p>The situation has also raised a broader question that has surfaced in other local discussions.</p>
<p>Toomey said she was told that certain food items could be offered for free, or by donation, without triggering the same level of permitting requirements.</p>
<p>That distinction has led to confusion among some business owners about how the exchange of money affects regulatory oversight.</p>
<p>At issue is whether the act of selling a food or beverage—versus giving it away—changes the underlying public health risk associated with that item, or whether the distinction is primarily regulatory.</p>
<h4><b>Looking Ahead</b></h4>
<p>Toomey is expected to appear before the Board of Health on April 29 as she continues seeking approval to sell prepackaged jellies and jams.</p>
<p>As of publication, the matter remains unresolved.</p>
<p>Town officials say discussions with the Leicester Regional Public Health Coalition are ongoing as they work to improve communication, consistency, and overall efficiency in the permitting process.</p>
<p><b>For now, the question of when—or whether—Post Road Trading will be permitted to sell prepackaged food remains unanswered.</b></p>
<p data-start="5119" data-end="5269">
</p><p><!-- /wp:paragraph --></p>						</div>
				</div>
					</div>
				</div>
							</div>
		]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>White’s Landing permit delay resolved after Board of Health review</title>
		<link>https://brookfieldexaminer.com/2026/04/15/whites-landing-permit-delay-resolved-after-board-of-health-review/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Christopher Kelleher]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2026 14:22:11 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Community News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food and Dining]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://brookfieldexaminer.com/?p=1825</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[White’s Landing permit delay resolved after Board of Health review BROOKFIELD — A long-established seasonal business in town will be able to open on schedule after a delay in its annual Board of Health permit prompted discussion at a recent public meeting. White’s Landing, which has operated in Brookfield for approximately 25 years, had its &#8230;<p class="read-more"> <a class="" href="https://brookfieldexaminer.com/2026/04/15/whites-landing-permit-delay-resolved-after-board-of-health-review/"> <span class="screen-reader-text">White’s Landing permit delay resolved after Board of Health review</span> Read More &#187;</a></p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[		<div data-elementor-type="wp-post" data-elementor-id="1825" class="elementor elementor-1825">
							<div class="elementor-element elementor-element-d597585 e-flex e-con-boxed e-con e-parent" data-id="d597585" data-element_type="container" data-settings="{&quot;content_width&quot;:&quot;boxed&quot;}" data-core-v316-plus="true">
					<div class="e-con-inner">
				<div class="elementor-element elementor-element-8263069 elementor-widget elementor-widget-text-editor" data-id="8263069" data-element_type="widget" data-widget_type="text-editor.default">
				<div class="elementor-widget-container">
							<h1><b>White’s Landing permit delay resolved after Board of Health review</b></h1>
<p><b>BROOKFIELD —</b> A long-established seasonal business in town will be able to open on schedule after a delay in its annual Board of Health permit prompted discussion at a recent public meeting.</p>
<p>White’s Landing, which has operated in Brookfield for approximately 25 years, had its permit held up this season following an inspection — the first time, according to the owner, that such an issue has arisen.</p>
<p>The matter was brought before the Board of Health at a recent meeting, where members ultimately voted to allow the business to operate while outstanding questions are reviewed.</p>
<h4><b>A longtime business encounters an unexpected hurdle</b></h4>
<p>For the owner, the delay came as a surprise given the business’s history.</p>
<p>“We’ve been here for years and never had a problem,” she said during the meeting. “This is our livelihood.”</p>
<p>In prior years, the permitting process had proceeded without issue. This season, however, the owner said she was informed that her permit would not be issued, but was not initially provided with a clear explanation.</p>
<p>With the opening of the season approaching, the uncertainty created concern about whether the business would be able to operate on time.</p>
<h4><b>“All they had to do was ask”</b></h4>
<p>The owner said the most difficult part of the experience was not knowing what was required to resolve the issue.</p>
<p>She described being told that the permit was being held up, but not what specific documentation or steps were needed.</p>
<p>“All they had to do was ask me for the documents,” she said. “I have everything.”</p>
<p>She described herself as a meticulous record keeper and said she maintains documentation related to her operations, including prior testing and compliance records.</p>
<p>Without clear guidance, she said, the situation became increasingly frustrating.</p>
<h4><b>Water testing questions raised</b></h4>
<p>The issue was ultimately tied, at least in part, to questions regarding water testing.</p>
<p>The owner said she had already completed testing and had documentation available. In a follow-up conversation, she described contacting the testing company to better understand the results.</p>
<p>“They started explaining it in technical terms, that I did not understand” she said. “So I asked them, what does that mean?”</p>
<p>According to the owner, she was told the results met a high standard.</p>
<p>“In layman’s terms, they told me my water is so clean it could be holy water,” she said.</p>
<p>She also said she was informed at one point that the matter may involve state-level considerations, though she said she was not provided with specific documentation outlining what was needed.</p>
<h4><b>Issue brought before the Board</b></h4>
<p>With the permit still unresolved and the season approaching, the owner addressed the Board of Health during a public meeting.</p>
<p>Board members heard directly from her regarding the delay and the lack of clarity surrounding the process.</p>
<p>Following discussion, the Board voted to allow White’s Landing to open for the season while any remaining questions are reviewed.</p>
<h4><b>Board cites transition and ongoing improvements</b></h4>
<p>Board of Health Chair Christina Predella said the situation comes during a period of transition.</p>
<p>She said the Board has been working to improve communication and transparency with regional public health partners and local businesses.&nbsp;</p><p><span style="font-style: inherit; text-align: var(--text-align);">Predella noted that recent changes — including the onboarding of the Leicester Regional Public Health Collaborative and the training of new agents — have contributed to delays in some processes.</span></p>
<p>“We recognize that this can be frustrating for applicants and businesses,” she said.</p>
<p>Predella said the Board is focused on improving consistency, clarity, and timeliness moving forward, and emphasized a collaborative approach.</p>
<p>“Our goal is always to balance public health responsibilities with a solution-oriented approach for our community,” she said.</p>
<h4><b>Preparing to open</b></h4>
<p data-start="166" data-end="249">With the permit now approved, White’s Landing is preparing for the upcoming season.</p>
<p data-start="251" data-end="526">The business, a long-time fixture in the community, offers a range of seasonal amenities, including lunch and light fare, coffee, kayak rentals, and a selection of small goods and lake-related items. The owner also prepares a variety of homemade baked goods and coffee items.</p>
<p><!-- /wp:paragraph --></p>						</div>
				</div>
					</div>
				</div>
							</div>
		]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
