Wave of Assaults Leads to Multiple Police Investigations at Brookfield Town Hall

Town Hall has been rattled by a series of alarming incidents, sparking concerns and raising questions about the current state of local governance and public decorum.

Election Day Altercation: A Startling Beginning

The week of disturbances began on Tuesday Election Day, casting a shadow over the democratic process. A First Amendment auditor, asserting his right to film in public spaces, allegedly faced a physical assault by our Constable Mark Grubbs in the main hallway at Town Hall. This altercation escalated to a physical level, with the auditor allegedly being taken to the ground in a manner reminiscent of a wrestling flip, as captured in the video. This vivid footage has provided clear evidence of the incidents.

This incident necessitated intervention by both Brookfield and Massachusetts State Police.  The altercation, which has since been the subject of intense public scrutiny, resulted in Brookfield Police Chief confirming that assault and battery charges are being pursued against the constable.   This incident raises serious questions about the freedom of speech and the role of law enforcement in public spaces

Amidst these tensions, a poll worker, overwhelmed by the unfolding events, experienced a panic attack and had to leave the premises. This incident underscores the emotional toll such disturbances can have on individuals performing their civic duties. Sheldon Greenberg of Johns Hopkins University highlights the need for effective interventions to mitigate the profound psychological impact of witnessing violence.

Studies show that exposure to violence can lead to increased depression, anxiety, and aggressive behavior, especially in young people (NCBI, Verywell Mind). The long-term psychological toll on those who witness such incidents cannot be overstated, as both victims and bystanders bear the burden of these traumatic experiences.

Press NH Now, known for his First Amendment audits, was involved in the recent altercation at the town hall. His audits focus on evaluating public institutions’ adherence to First Amendment rights, particularly regarding freedom of speech and the right to record in public spaces. During these audits, he records interactions at public facilities, which are then shared on YouTube, shedding light on public officials’ and institutions’ responses to situations involving constitutional freedoms.

In an exclusive interview, Press NH Now described the event at Brookfield Town Hall as one of the most challenging encounters he has faced during his audits. He recounted that previous audits, especially those revealing shortcomings in upholding First Amendment rights at town halls, often triggered a barrage of phone calls and emails to the institutions involved. Based on these past experiences, Brookfield Town Hall might expect a similar influx of public response following this recent incident

Auditor’s Reflections: Envisioning a Positive Path Forward for Brookfield’s Civic Engagement

Press NH Now, the First Amendment auditor, visited not only Brookfield Town Hall but also Spencer Town Hall on the same day. According to staff members at Spencer Town Hall, his conduct there was markedly different; they described his behavior as pleasant and cooperative. This contrasting experience raises questions about why the interactions at the two locations diverged so significantly.

Staff at Spencer Town Hall noted that they have prior experience with First Amendment Rights and auditors. This familiarity might contribute to their ability to handle such visits more effectively. They indicated an understanding of the auditors’ rights and objectives, suggesting that this knowledge might help in facilitating smoother interactions.

The stark difference in the auditor’s experiences at the two town halls could potentially be attributed to varying levels of awareness and preparedness among the staff regarding First Amendment rights. While Brookfield’s encounter escalated into an incident, Spencer’s experience remained uneventful, possibly reflecting differing approaches in managing and responding to such audits.

Al Jones, a prominent community leader in Brookfield, offered a pragmatic solution to mitigate similar issues in the future. He proposed, “Why not implement a designated area for recording during election days? Something as straightforward as marking a square with painter’s tape on the floor could be effective. This would ensure a balance between the right to record and maintaining orderly conduct at the polls.” This suggestion by Jones highlights a simple yet potentially effective way to delineate spaces for auditors and ensure smooth operations during critical civic events like elections

In a positive step toward change, Town Hall staff and other key personnel will undergo comprehensive training on individual rights, focusing on scenarios involving filming and citizens’ rights. Karen Trainor Resseguie, from the select board’s office, elaborated on this initiative, stating, ‘We are organizing a training program for daytime office employees, clerical staff, registrars, poll workers, and librarians. The training will concentrate on First Amendment rights, particularly in the context of public interactions.

The training will take place at 2 p.m. on Monday, December 11th. To facilitate this, the Town Hall will close at 2 and remain closed for the rest of the day.

This training session, closing the Town Hall to the public, reflects a commitment to education and correction. It ensures better interactions between public officials and citizens, particularly in situations involving constitutional rights and public safety. By involving a diverse group of staff members, the training aims to create a more informed and responsive environment in various public service areas

Brookfield Board of Health Meeting Erupts into Violence

During Wednesday night’s Board of Health meeting, which was broadcast live on our Facebook page, a deeply concerning incident unfolded. The violent episode originated from a sequence of provocative interactions, beginning with Chairperson Ms. Maureen Lepak mocking Board Member Christopher Kelleher for his Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). This act of insensitivity led to a member of the public, David Fromm vocally defending Mr. Kelleher, telling Ms. Lepak in strong terms to cease her derogatory remarks. “shut the f*** up”

The situation escalated when Ms. Lepak ordered Mr. Fromm to leave the meeting. In a twist, Mr. Fromm  then suggested that Mr. Kelleher should exit the meeting. As Mr. Kelleher began gathering his belongings, Christopher Lepak, the chairperson’s husband, engaged in provocative behavior, clapping loudly and chanting in a manner that seemed to celebrate their departure. “Yeah, they are leaving!,  yea!,”  This behavior was not addressed by the Chair, Ms. Lepak, during the meeting. The sequence of events, including this unaddressed behavior, escalated to the physical confrontation that followed.

The tense atmosphere in the meeting escalated dramatically when Christopher Lepak, the chairperson’s husband, abruptly stopped his clapping and chanting. In a sudden and aggressive action, he leapt from his seat and charged towards David Fromm from behind. As Mr. Fromm was attempting to leave the room, Mr. Lepak grabbed him by the neck.

The role of Christopher Lepak in the Board of Health meetings raises questions about the dynamics within these public sessions. Officially, he attends to record the meetings for his wife, the Chair, but incidents like these suggest a more complex involvement. His actions during the meeting – from provocative clapping and chanting to the physical altercation with Mr. Fromm – have been described by an anonymous source as painting a picture of an “enforcer-like presence.”’ The source, who expressed concerns about their own safety, elaborated on the implications of such behavior: “This situation leads to concerns about the safety and freedom of expression for the people of Brookfield. If attendees fear repercussions for voicing opinions that may not align with the Chair’s views, it could severely undermine the democratic nature of these meetings. The community might reasonably question the openness and fairness of these public forums, where speaking one’s mind should be a right, not a cause for intimidation”

In the aftermath, Mr. Fromm expressed his dismay, saying, “I could not simply stand by while the chairperson openly mocked a disable person, it’s unacceptable” This statement from Mr. Fromm underscores the importance of sensitivity and decorum in public discourse, particularly in how we address and acknowledge mental health and disabilities.

Leadership Conduct at Brookfield Board of Health Meeting Draws Scrutiny

During the recent Brookfield Board of Health meeting, the conduct of both Chairperson Ms. Maureen Lepak and Vice Chair Christina Predella has come under critical examination. In the wake of the physical altercation involving Ms. Lepak’s husband, Christopher Lepak, there were notable absences of intervention from these key figures.

The Chair Ms. Maureen Lepak did not call her husband out of order, issue any warnings, or expel him from the room, despite his initiating a physical altercation. This lack of response from the Chairperson diverges from standard protocol expected in managing disruptions during public meetings. No disciplinary action was taken against Christopher Lepak, at all and he was even allowed to stay for the remainder of the meeting.

Compounding these concerns, Vice Chair Christina Predella, despite holding a leadership role, also did not make any comments or take action in response to Christopher Lepak’s behavior. This inaction is highlighted by her earlier readiness to reprimand Mr. Fromm for laughing during the proceedings. The contrast between her response to a minor disruption and her silence during a significant disturbance has raised questions about the consistency and impartiality in enforcing rules of conduct.

These instances have intensified discussions within the Brookfield community about the responsibilities of leadership and the fair enforcement of meeting rules. The community is now calling for clear and consistent application of conduct guidelines, ensuring that all meeting participants, irrespective of their relationships or positions, are held to the same standards of behavior. The need for leadership that demonstrates unbiased and equitable management of meeting protocols is more pronounced than ever, as the town seeks to ensure that future meetings are conducted with fairness and respect for all individuals present.

Service Dog’s Intense Distress Amidst Board Meeting Chaos

During the recent Board of Health meeting in Brookfield, a concerning incident occurred involving board member Christopher Kelleher and his service dog, Rosie. While the meeting was in session, Vice Chair Christina Predella, focused on her cellphone, walked behind Mr. Kelleher’s chair where Rosie was positioned. During this movement, Ms. Predella’s foot came into contact with Rosie, causing the dog’s body to move noticeably.

The circumstances leading up to this moment raise several questions. It remains unclear why Ms. Predella chose that moment to make a phone call, why she opted to walk behind Mr. Kelleher and Rosie, and why there was no immediate acknowledgment or reaction from her after the contact with Rosie. This incident has brought to the forefront issues of animal welfare, particularly in environments where disturbances and distractions are prevalent

A poignant and disturbing aspect of the recent Brookfield Board of Health meeting was the intense fear exhibited by Rosie.  Amidst the chaos and rising tensions, Rosie was seen shaking uncontrollably, a clear sign of acute distress. Her wide, fearful eyes darted around in apparent terror, visually embodying the unsettling nature of the situation. Even Chairperson Ms. Maureen Lepak, amidst the unfolding events, acknowledged the dog’s evident panic with a comment: “Oh, poor dog.” This moment highlighted not only the emotional toll that such high-tension environments can have on animals but also underscored the need for consideration and care for service animals, especially in potentially volatile situations.

Lasting Impact on Service Dog Post Board Meeting Incident 

The aftermath of the recent Brookfield Board of Health meeting has had a lasting impact not only on the attendees but also on Rosie, the service dog of Board Member Christopher Kelleher. Reflecting on the incident and its effects on Rosie, Mr. Kelleher shared, “The town hall incident was really hard on both me and Rosie.  Her distress and the fact she was off for days afterward was my biggest concern. Adding to this, Rosie’s service vest was ripped as she tried to escape the madness.   That vest wasn’t just any item; it used to belong to Elise, my previous service dog the vest holds so many memories and so much sentimental value this added a layer of sadness to an already difficult situation. It was like a reminder of how much had gone wrong that day”

This statement from Mr. Kelleher adds a personal dimension to the story, highlighting the prolonged anxiety and distress experienced by Rosie following the tumultuous events of the meeting. It underscores the often-overlooked consequences such confrontations can have on service animals, who are deeply attuned to their environment and their owners’ emotions.

This incident has consequently sparked discussions within the Brookfield community about the importance of maintaining a calm and safe environment in public meetings, for the sake of all attendees, both human and animal.

Select Board Meeting: A Continued Pattern of Disturbance 

The unsettling events in Brookfield extended into Thursday, just before the Select Board meeting. We received a report that Mr. John David Holdcraft was involved in an intense altercation with the town administrator, Kelli Robbins, within the Town Hall’s kitchen. This report, which we have yet to independently verify as it comes from a single source, suggests that the argument escalated to the point where Mr. Holdcraft allegedly pushed a door into Ms. Robbins. The altercation reportedly grew so heated that an individual there for a job interview felt compelled to intervene. While this incident, marked by its severity, reflects deep personal animosities, it also highlights broader issues of tension and discord within the town’s administrative operations. As with all our reporting, we strive for accuracy and are actively working to confirm these details through additional sources

Beyond Job Descriptions

The situation at the town hall escalated when Mr. Holdcraft reportedly sought to enter the kitchen where Ms. Robbins and Mr. Regan, were having a private conversation. According to Mr. Holdcraft, his request to join them, under the pretext of getting water, was denied, leading to heightened tensions. “No, I want to get some water,” Holdcraft recounted, expressing his frustration at the closed door. He also claimed that when Mr. Regan asked for a moment, he responded, “Fine, you have one minute” only to have the door allegedly slammed in his face.  “they slammed the door right in my face “ Holdcraft recounted.  

Contradicting the widely reported involvement of a job interviewee in defusing the situation, Mr. Holdcraft initially asserted that the individual’s attempt to intervene was unwelcome, leading him to tell the interviewee to “shut the f*** up and mind his business” and to “sit the f*** down.” However, this statement led to further questioning, as Mr. Holdcraft had initiated the conversation by expressing his disapproval of David Fromm’s use of profanity in Town Hall.

When confronted with this contradiction, Mr. Holdcraft appeared to backtrack, suggesting that he might not have used the expletive but felt compelled to. He stated, ‘Perhaps I didn’t actually say the f-word, but in the heat of the moment, that’s what I was thinking.’ This revision and the uncertainty surrounding what was actually said raise questions about the nature of the altercation and the reported involvement of others. It also mirrors a recent incident at the Board of Health meeting where similar language was deemed out of order.

This extraordinary intervention, or even the attempt of intervention especially by someone simply there to interview for a position, underscores the severity of the incident. Upon reviewing the job description for the position within the Highway Department, it was noted that “breaking up Town Hall fights” is notably absent from the listed responsibilities. This incident not only breached the professional decorum of the town hall but also raises serious concerns about the impact of such personal disputes on both the workplace environment and the public’s perception of our town’s administration.

Reflection and Response: A Town in Disquiet 

The recent string of back-to-back incidents at Brookfield’s Town Hall has plunged both residents and officials into a state of bewilderment and concern. The consecutive days of disruptions, marked by increasing severity, have laid bare deeper issues plaguing the town’s administrative and civic environment. Beyond the immediate need for enhanced security and enforced decorum at public meetings, there’s a growing call for a more proactive and empowered approach from the town’s leadership.

Concerns have been repeatedly raised about the select board’s perceived lack of authority. Statements from select board members themselves, suggesting that they feel ‘powerless’ in certain situations, only add to the community’s unease. This sentiment points to a critical need for structural and procedural changes that empower the select board to effectively address and manage such situations. Fostering a respectful atmosphere in public meetings and ensuring that town officials have the necessary tools and authority to maintain order and facilitate constructive dialogue are now seen as essential steps for the town to regain its footing and restore public confidence.

Looking Forward: A Call for Calm and Constructive Dialogue

As Brookfield grapples with these recent unsettling events, there is a growing call for calm, balanced, and constructive dialogue. The town stands at a crucial crossroads, facing the challenge of mending divisions and ensuring that public spaces remain arenas for healthy, respectful, and inclusive discourse.

In the wake of these incidents, the community’s focus is now shifting towards healing and rebuilding a sense of trust in its public institutions. This requires a comprehensive response from town officials and community leaders alike. The aim is to foster an environment where differences can be addressed constructively, and where every member feels heard and valued. Brookfield’s path forward hinges on its ability to come together as a community, demonstrating resilience and a commitment to positive change